The Reality of Troy Davis

Friday, September 23, 2011 5:42 pm Daniel J. Summers

Can you believe the state of Georgia executed a man where 7 of the 9 witnesses against him recanted? If you find that hard to swallow, you should; it's simply not true. The reality is that 34 witnesses testified against Davis - 34. It is true that 7 of them altered their testimony in some way; however, those alterations included:

• 2 statements with subtle differences before the trial; these discrepancies were both addressed during the trial, and the witnesses did not say they lied or were coerced at all.
• 2 statements were impossible to believe (according to the judge); they didn't match with the other testimony, and one of them even conflicted with Davis' mother's testimony.
• 2 came from affidavits where the defense refused to put the affiants on the stand, rendering them unable to be cross-examined. The judge did not allow this.
• 1 was a credible recantation, but the judge felt his testimony was of limited value for the prosecution.

So, rather than 78% (7/9) of the witnesses recanting, as claimed in the popular version of the story (picked up and perpetrated by those who are philosophically opposed to the death penalty in any case), we're looking at 3% (1/34) of the witnesses recanting. Now, for those who are opposed to the death penalty, that's still 3% too much; but, when you have someone who shot someone else once to knock them down, then came back and shot them again, while standing at point-blank range above them - 3% is within the margin of error. Even if everyone opposed to death penalty lied to keep him alive, you'd expect the percentage to be higher than that.

Lest you think I'm making this up, the documents are available for public perusal. Part 1 Part 2

I know that many of my friends are feeling sorrow and anger over this execution; hopefully having the facts will help you feel less sorrow or anger. In this case, you may object to the method, but know that it was not applied inappropriately in this case.

You Mean Captial Punishment Works?

Tuesday, June 12, 2007 11:26 am Daniel J. Summers

Those of us who are for capital punishment have always maintained that, even if it doesn't deter future crime, it punishes the offender. Now, a new study has found that is actually is a good deterrent!

“Science does really draw a conclusion. It did. There is no question about it,” said Naci Mocan, an economics professor at the University of Colorado at Denver. “The conclusion is there is a deterrent effect.”

They were even able to quantify the results…

Each execution deters an average of 18 murders, according to a 2003 nationwide study by professors at Emory University. (Other studies have estimated the deterred murders per execution at three, five and 14).

Speeding up executions would strengthen the deterrent effect. For every 2.75 years cut from time spent on death row, one murder would be prevented, according to a 2004 study by an Emory University professor.

A 2003 study he co-authored, and a 2006 study that re-examined the data, found that each execution results in five fewer homicides, and commuting a death sentence means five more homicides.

Surely, these folks must be some right-wing crime-and-punishment wackos, right?

“The results are robust, they don't really go away,” he said. “I oppose the death penalty. But my results show that the death penalty (deters) what am I going to do, hide them?”

Check out the entire article - it's very good. Once again, common sense has data to back it up.