Two Great Lines and a “Not So Fast…”

Well, I’ll start with the “not so fast”…  This is a local issue, so if you’re reading from somewhere other than Montgomery, AL, this first part may not make a whole lot of sense to you.

The Montgomery County school board has fired Chris Baxter from his head coaching and athletic director positions at Lee High School.  He is currently under investigation for an “inappropriate relationship” with another employee there at the school.  I know Chris, and I have a hard time believing that he has done some of the things of which he has been accused – I believe this whole scenario is a misunderstanding.  On top of that, I feel that the school board’s action, based on a request from the principal of the school, is too hasty.  Chris is currently on administrative leave from the school, where he also teaches.  If he didn’t do what he’s been accused of doing, why should he no longer be the coach?  And, if he did do it, why should he still be a teacher?

I hope that everything is cleared up quickly, and that the school board will reconsider its hasty actions.  True, Lee had their first winless season in recent memory this past season; but, it takes time for a coach to build a program.  (The program was obviously already in trouble, to be bringing in a new coach in the first place.)  Chris has worked hard to realize his goals of being a successful teacher and coach, and to take that away before the investigation has been completed goes against the traditional “innocent until proven guilty” modus operandi that we Americans pride ourselves on using.

Now for the two great lines.  The first comes to us courtesy of Phyllis Schafly, as she talks about the way feminists are using normal men’s elevated view of women against them…

When will American men learn how to stand up to the nagging by the intolerant, uncivil feminists whose sport is to humiliate men?  Men should stop treating feminists like ladies, and instead treat them like the men they say they want to be.

And, Thomas Sowell, as he discusses the “free speech” claims being bantied about by those upset at Ward Churchill.

Freedom of speech does not imply a right to an audience.

I wish I was able to say that much with that few words…

Patriots Win! But Do They Have a Mandate?

Sunday’s win by the New England Patriots over the Philadelphia Eagles in Super Bowl XXXIX, their 3rd win in the past 4 years, has solidified this team as this millenium’s first NFL dynasty.  Coach Bill Belichek and quarterback Tom Brady (both off to the NFL’s best postseason records) are but two of many outstanding teammates on this well-rounded team.  While the first half was a defensive battle, punctuated by very untimely turnovers by both sides, the second half saw the Patriots open up a lead that proved to be insurmountable.

“I don’t know what happened,” said Donovan McNabb, quarterback for the Eagles.  “We were having a pretty good game.  New England is the type of team that likes to open things up early, and when the first half ended 7-7, I thought we had a pretty good shot.”  Head Coach Andy Reid spoke up next.  “Coming down the stretch, though, we really had it rough.  (Patriot Kicker Adam) Vinateri and his “Field Goal for Truth” put us down by 10 points, and that late in the game, it was just something we couldn’t overcome.”

While they openly congratulated the Patriots on their win, there are strong feelings among many of the Eagles that the Patriots don’t really have a mandate to traipse about the country proclaiming themselves “NFL champions.”  “You know, we scored more points againt the Patriots than any other team had since February 1st.  And, of all the points scored in the game, we scored almost 47% of them,” an unnamed teammate said.  Another chimed in, “Really – can they really go around saying “We won” when they only won by 6%?  These folks are just arrogant.”

And, while the Eagles are grousing about the closeness of the game, other sections of the country are complaining about being disenfranchised.  “You know, this was really a regional game – Boston and Philadelphia are just 300 miles apart!  Hopefully we can avoid this disenfranchisement next year.  Heck, with us going 2-14 last year, we’re trying to make sure the NFL doesn’t disenfranchise us,” said Mike Nolan, recently named head coach of the San Francisco 49′ers.

Warren Sapp of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers was more direct.  “For New England to say they are “World Champions” is ludicrous.  Did they play anyone from Canada?  Mexico?  Europe?  I don’t think so.  These commentators talking “dynasty this” and “dynasty that” are really [torquing] me off.”  His tone changed a little when asked about his XXXVII (2003) Super Bowl ring.  “Well, you know, we really had a tough season that season.  To come in with a new coach, and overcome losses and fines, that meant something.  I don’t think those goody-two-shoe Patriots have had a dollar of fines in the whole lot of them.”

Is this true?  Of course not.  The Patriots won fair and square, after a hard-fought contest, and by a slim but adequate margin.  No one would dispute their claim to the 2004 NFL Championship.  Sadly, similar claims by those in the political arena are true.  Think about this the next time you hear a DNC talking head prattling on about “no mandate” for our President.  (And, for those of you that think the above just isn’t really all that funny – don’t worry, I’m not quitting my day job.)

You Don’t Say…

Ran across this quote today in the Wall Street Journal‘s Best of the Web Today (January 26th, 4th item down), written by an editor of a leftward-leaning magazine…

“And if a new Supreme Court overturns affirmative-action laws, Democrats will need to pursue equality in ways that avoid treating whites and blacks differently.”

Ya think?  (Maybe that’s what they should have pursued to begin with…)

The 2nd Annual Sanctity of Human Life and Martin Luther King Jr. Column

Last year, I wrote a quick blurb about the the sanctity of human life, and a longer piece about Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s dream that is, as of yet, unfulfilled.  This year, I’m combining the two occurrences (and putting it out 5 days late, but who’s counting?) with a single entry.

First up is the sanctity of human life.  Dictionary.com defines sanctity (definition 2) as “The quality or condition of being considered sacred; inviolability.”  What this means is that human life is sacred – something that is to be valued, and not to be taken lightly.  It also means that life is not ours to create (ever, outside of the God-given means) or to destroy (save for the Biblically-based governmental duties of defense and punishment).  There is encouraging news on the abortion front – Norma McCorvey, “Roe” in the (in)famous Roe v. Wade case, has entered a petition to the Supreme Court to review her case in light of new medical evidence of the effects of abortion on the women who have them.  Together with Operation Outcry, which has compiled quite an array of statistics on medical issues with abortion, she hopes to get that ruling reversed.  As an original petitioner in the case, she is in the unique position of being able to do this, and more details, including the briefs that were filed, can be found here.

There are others who have recently written about abortion as well.  Chuck Colson’s recent article entitled Destroying Abortion Myths demonstrates that they hysterical “dangerous back-ally abortion” crowd actually made up their statistics.  (And they say Bush lied and people died?  How about “NOW lied, babies died”?)  Marvin Olasky compares two tidal waves: the tsunami and abortion.  (Did you know that as many people as died in that tsunami are killed every few months before they breathe their first breath?)  Another site is Right Thinking Girl‘s entry A Woman’s Right to Choose – it illustrates the absurdity of the “fetus as property” argument.  I’ve also been active in the comments for this entry, in which folks have been debating the issue from pretty much all sides – my entries are the ones from “Daniel”.  (Be warned, some comments may contain strong language.)  And finally, this isn’t recent, but my entry about abortion being a bad idea whose time has passed still lays out, from a non-religious perspective, why abortion is wrong.

The numbers of abortions that have been performed is staggering – the latest numbers from Census 2000 show blacks as 11.4% of the population, but the CDC’s “Abortion Facts” website’s numbers show blacks have 33.9% of the abortions in this country.  That means that blacks are overrepresented in abortion by 200%.  This is not good, and (as we segue into the MLK portion of this entry) it’s something I think Dr. King would have worked to end.  So much of his dream has been fufilled, but I believe he would be horrified at these statistics.  The people for whom Dr. King gave his life working for (and, lost his life as part of that work) aren’t being killed and suppressed by the “white man” anymore.  Take this abortion statistic together with gang and prostitution statistics, and you see that they’re suppressing and killing off themselves!

Dr. King’s legacy has been hijacked by the pseudo-civil-rights activists of our day.  His was a message of peace, and of equality; not of opression, not of violence, and not of reversing the inequality.  Though he was taken from us much too soon, his work endures – and to hear gay marriage proponents use his words in support of their agenda must make him look down on us and shake his head.  His dream of equality in all areas, but especially economically, is beginning to be realized.

However, popular black culture does not encourage activities that lead to prosperity.  When was the last time you heard a rapper rap about his mutual funds, 401K, or real estate investments?  How about consumable goods (cars, electronics, etc.)?  I’ll give you a hint – one of those is a lot better at building long-term wealth than the other.  Bill Cosby is taking a lot of flak for his comments that have been critical of the culture.  I’m glad he’s saying these things, because he has a lot of respect from folks in the black community.  Maybe if the message comes from someone who is so respected, it will sink in.  Children who are trying hard to achieve shouldn’t be ostracized from their peers and accused of “acting white.”  Learning to speak the language properly isn’t selling out, it’s setting yourself up for success.  (Now, since I’m not black, I guess I should interject here that I know plenty of white people who are foolish with their money, and whose grasp of the English language is less than it should be.  I also know plenty of black people, some my very good friends, who do not conform to the pop culture image with which they’re bombarded on a daily basis.)

By realizing how precious life is, defending those who are defenseless, and empowering people to make their own destiny, we will honor not only Dr. King, but all those who follow after us.  May the next generation look at us and say, “You know, they figured it out, and they lived it the way they should.”

Boo! for Law and Order

I am just sick up to the top of my neck with prime time programming’s incessant infatuation with homosexuality.  The latest egregious display was at the end of last night’s Law and Order, where Serena, the Assistant D. A. played by Elizabeth Rohm, was fired.  Throughout the four years she’s been on the show, we’ve really seen nothing of her family.  After being told to pack her things, she replies, “Is this because I’m a lesbian?”  Now granted, the writers hadn’t developed her character out enough for anyone to know whether this was true or not, but why bring it into the last episode?  It wasn’t even a very good scene – it seemed unnatural for Ms. Rohm (and I have no idea if she actually is gay or not – doesn’t really matter to me).

Now, in re-runs, it won’t be consuming me – I really have no obsession over knowing someone’s (or even a fictional character’s) sexual proclivities.  But, the principle of it left me with a bad taste in my mouth, and this “ambush homosexuality” will tint my view of her character when I see re-runs on A&E or TNT.  (I’m also a little disappointed that Fred Thompson was part of that scene, but that’s just something I’ll have to get over, I suppose…)  I watch ER too, and they have a required gay character – but at least they’ve developed the character; and, whether I agree with the statements the character made or not, it wasn’t something just thrown up in the audience’s face at the last minute.

I sure hope that future “farewells” for folks have a bit more substance, and less statement-making…

Log In · Green Hope Theme by Sivan & schiy · Proudly powered by WordPress 3.3.1